This essay will outline three justifications for Euthanasia/Assisted death including quality of life, the emotional pain of losing self-reliance and autonomy, and three justifications against including the devaluation of life, abuse of the vulnerable, and discouragement for new research Arguments for and against Euthanasia Euthanasia, also known as good death or physician assisted suicide (PAS), is a method ordinarily used for animals that are in discomfort and need to be put out of their suffering. Many pet owners contemplate this option to be the most compassionate way to say goodbye to their beloved animals This essay discusses the arguments for and against the concept of euthanasia. Description of the Topic Euthanasia can be defined as the intentional termination of the life of one person by the other based on the explicit request of the first-person seeking death as the last resort to free him/her from all the sufferings of a terminal disease
Euthanasia Pros And Cons - Free Essay Example - Words | blogger.com
The main issue has been the appropriate use of technological advances at the end of life. Should these advances be used on every patient despite the chance of an undesired outcome? If not, what guidelines should be put into effect for the use and non-use of medical interventions during this time? This paper will address the ethical issues that guide medical practice and focus on end of life ethical issues such as assisted suicide, the difference between killing and allowing to die, life sustaining measures, euthanasia for and against essay, and medical futility. Want to get an original essay on this topic? The main issue in the care of the dying patient is the proper use of life sustaining interventions.
In some cases, there is very little to euthanasia for and against essay benefit to be gained by these interventions Walker, Commonly, when the benefits are overpowered by the potential harms or risks of medical treatment, it is determined as not appropriate for the patient Walker, Who has the ultimate authority is the main question that has left many wandering if the decision should be made by the physician or on a policy level Walker. From an ethical standpoint, the patient is the one to make the decision regarding life sustaining interventions based upon autonomy Walker, In many cases, ethical treatment decisions should be done between the patient and provider.
In every case mentioned, the provider has fulfilled their ethical obligation to give every option available to the patient Walker, The patient, then uses their autonomy in choosing or rejecting treatment. The provider may still attempt to persuade the patient to choose the option they think is best but the provider should not insist euthanasia for and against essay the patient making the decision that they feel is euthanasia for and against essay Walker, The right for a patient to refuse any medical treatment is well known within medicine as well as the law Walker, In cases where patients have lost the ability but had addressed in an advance directive that they did not want life-saving procedures, courts have ruled that their wishes should be honored.
Circumstances where there is no written advance directive and the patient is unable to make a medical decision, courts have laws in place for a proxy to make these decisions Walker, Cases where patients have expressed their wishes before being deemed incapable to do so, the proxy should follow the wishes rather than make their own decisions Walker, It is well known that there is no ethical obligation for physicians to provide treatment that is futile Walker, Unfortunately, futility in the medical sense can have several meanings. An example of this would be as follows; While explaining to a patient that cardiopulmonary resuscitation CPR would be futile, the patient then interprets the meaning of the term to be that treatment will not have any chance of success.
If the patient then agrees that CPR would not be a viable option, the decision will have been based completely on a misunderstanding. It is important for providers to be matter of fact about these matters by using simple language instead masking true meaning behind medical terminology Walker, When life sustaining measures are discontinued, whether it euthanasia for and against essay due to medical futility or patient autonomy, there can be extreme emotions that come with our actions Walker, In an unconscious ventilator patient, the patient is alive until the provider removes the ventilator, and the patient soon passes away Walker, Because of this, many medical providers are more comfortable with not starting life sustaining treatment than with stopping it Walker, euthanasia for and against essay, Another issue is the concern of a ventilator as an optional form of external support Walker, However, it is still considered a form of homicide and is currently illegal in the United States Walker, When euthanasia is performed with the consent and understanding of the patient, it is called voluntary euthanasia Walker, Assisted suicide is considered voluntary euthanasia that is legal in the state of Oregon Walker, In Oregon, a patient can be prescribed a lethal amount of medication so that the patient can take their own life with the medication if he or she so chooses to do so Walker, There tends to be a lot of interest in physician assisted suicide among the population Walker, Ethical issues that involve end of life dilemmas will always be among us as healthcare professionals.
We will face situations, that despite our best efforts will not go the way we had planned. Our hearts will break when we overhear the physician tell the patient that nothing more can be done or when a family member makes a decision for our patient that we do not agree with, euthanasia for and against essay. There will be times that we will see patients give up and others where we will see our patients fight with all that they have. The hardest part that we will face is knowing that sometimes no matter how great the medical effort, not every life can or will be saved. Euthanasia Pros And Cons. com, Jun 23, Accessed April 18, comJun Euthanasia Pros and Cons.
Order paper like this. Did you like this example? Type your requirements and get professional help. Deadline: 10 days left. Number of pages. Email Invalid email. A professional writer will euthanasia for and against essay a clear, mistake-free paper for you! Stuck on ideas? Struggling with a concept? Get help with your assigment. Leave your email and we will send a sample to you. Email Send me the sample. Please check your inbox. Interested in this topic? Professional experts can help. Ask expert for help. Please indicate where to send you the sample. Didn't find the paper that you were euthanasia for and against essay for? Any subject. Pay if satisfied, euthanasia for and against essay.
Essays Against Euthanasia
, time: 0:40Euthanasia: Points For and Against | Free Essay Example
Euthanasia – Arguments in Favour and Against. Euthanasia (“good death”) is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. It is also known as ‘mercy killing’. In many countries, there is a divisive public controversy over the Outline an argument for and an argument against the issue, from a secular perspective. Euthanasia allows the ill or elderly to die with dignity and with peace as their quality of life is taken into account. Instead of being forced to live a painful and undignified remainder of life, the patient should be allowed to have the suffering taken away This essay will outline three justifications for Euthanasia/Assisted death including quality of life, the emotional pain of losing self-reliance and autonomy, and three justifications against including the devaluation of life, abuse of the vulnerable, and discouragement for new research
No comments:
Post a Comment