Aug 27, · Home — Essay Samples — Entertainment — 12 Angry Men — Analysis of Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers Essay about 12 Angry Men Agression Analysis. The trial takes place on the ‘hottest day of the year’. This inevitable heat sets the stage for the aggression that arises in the most of the men hence the title ’12 Angry Men’. Aggression can be described as any form of behavior that is intended to injure someone physically or psychologically Jun 10, · This analytical essay on 12 Angry Men: Overview and Analysis was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly
Analysis of Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose: [Essay Example], words GradesFixer
12 angry men analysis essay Articles. This movie analysis will focus on the movie 12 Angry Men. There will be comparisons between the movie and the different negotiation tactics used in the movie and even in class, 12 angry men analysis essay. There were lessons learned from this movie and it gave new ways of thinking. This movie does a great job of using negotiation to win over a case when you are the odd man out. This movie focuses on a jury deliberating a first-degree murder charge on an eighteen year old boy. The boy is accused of stabbing his father to death. If found guilty of the charges, 12 angry men analysis essay, the eighteen year old boy will face the death sentence. There are many reasons as to why the boy looks guilty.
Verified writer. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven of them think the boy is guilty, except one. This is juror number eight. He claims he just does not know if the boy is guilty or not guilty, and wants to talk. For each reason, 12 angry men analysis essay, juror number eight questions each reasoning the other jurors bring up. Some realize they are prejudice or are holding grudges, 12 angry men analysis essay, or they are simply voting guilty because of their backgrounds. Juror eight is hesitant about sending a boy to die without talking about it first. He remains calm throughout the whole deliberation. The only time he shows signs of anger is when two other jury members start playing tic-tac-toe.
This bothers him because everyone should be paying attention to what is going on and not playing games. Throughout the deliberation, he uncovers information never presented at the trial, and helps the other jurors to think that it just may not be possible the boy could be guilty. Each character in the movie has a different personality about them which influences their decision on the verdict and they each express their own opinions based on their characteristics. Each juror plays a part in the movie where their personalities reflect back on a certain argument in the case. Juror one Martin Balsam is also known as the foreman of the group. He is put in charge to run the deliberation between all of the jurors. Juror two John Fiedler is quiet and goes along with what everyone else says. He changes his vote early, though, to not guilty.
He mentions about the height difference between the father and the boy, and how the boy would go about stabbing him. Juror three Lee J. Cobb is the angry member of the group. He is convinced the boy is 12 angry men analysis essay no matter what anyone says. There 12 angry men analysis essay a time in the movie where 12 angry men analysis essay discusses that when his son was fifteen, he got in a fight with him and his son hit him. Juror three is angry with his son for his actions and for leaving, that he is taking out this anger on the boy in trial.
Juror four E. Marshall is very convinced that the boy is guilty. He shows no sign of emotion and is able to recall much of what happened throughout the trial. He gets nervous though, as he cannot recall a certain movie he saw the other night, just as the boy could not do the same. Juror five Jack Klugman is a shy man. He lived in a slum all his life and can almost relate to the boy on trial, for he lives in a slum as well. He is an expert at using a switch knife, which comes in handy during the deliberation. Juror six Edward Binns is quite during the deliberation. Juror seven Jack Warden wants the deliberation to be over as quick as possible because he has tickets to a baseball game later that evening.
He votes not guilty and does not wish to discuss why or why not. 12 angry men analysis essay eight Henry Fonda votes not guilty from the start of their meeting. He remains clam and patient throughout the deliberation. Juror nine Joseph Sweeney is an old man. He is the second person to vote not guilty, for he wants to hear more about the case. Juror ten Ed Begley is also an angry man. He is racist, and also very prejudice against people who come from a slum, which is why he believes the boy is guilty. Juror eleven George Voskovec takes the trial seriously, 12 angry men analysis essay. He stands up for what he believes in. Juror 12 Robert Webber is a smart man. He works for an advertising agency and has a hard time explaining his choice for changing his vote to not guilty.
One example is with Juror five. During the trial, the boy was convicted of murdering is father using a switch knife as the weapon and stabbing his father down in the chest. Juror two makes a point on the height difference between the boy and his father, and how the boy would proceed to kill his father, meaning how he would have stabbed him. During the trial, it was stated that the boy was an expert at using a switch knife. Juror five goes to demonstrate exactly how the boy would have pulled out the knife and stabbed his father: from underneath. He said it would take too much time to switch hands and stab down in his chest. Without Juror five having the knowledge and his personal characteristic of using a switch knife, the jury would have never learned how an experienced knife handler would have used the weapon.
A few of this tactics were talked about during our class and case studies but some of 12 angry men analysis essay tactics were commonly used in everyday negotiations by everyone. We talked about power and how you could use power to get your way; you could use facts against the other party because facts are something you cannot ignore and emotions. Emotions are a hard tactic to master because you need to set aside your emotions so you can make a fair and honest judgment or answer. Juror eight shows power over the other jurors. He has information the other jurors do not know about, and he is able to negotiate with them more. The other jurors only listened to what was presented in the trial.
But Juror eight actually thought about the facts presented, and went out to look for more information. One way he did this was with the knife. The boy had bought the same knife used to kill his father the same night the murder happened. The boy claimed he had lost the knife, as it had fell through his pocket on his way to the movies. The owner of the shop where he had bought the knife claimed it was very unique, and he had never seen any other kind like it in his store. Juror eight asks to see the knife found at 12 angry men analysis essay crime scene, 12 angry men analysis essay. Everyone else is convinced this is the same knife the boy had bought, until Juror eight surprises them and pulls out the exact same knife. He saw the same knife and bought it at a cheap cost.
Is it possible the old man heard the boy scream that? Juror eight stated that he had lived in an apartment next to the L tracks before and the sound of a train passing by is unbearable. Another juror said he had 12 angry men analysis essay finished painting one of the apartments and agreed that the sound is very loud. Juror eight had power over the others for he himself knew that the sound was very loud and it may not be possible the old man heard the boy say these things. The way the facts were presented during the movie were all facts the jurors figured out themselves while deliberating, and not during the trial. There were many unanswered questions during the trial which caused Juror eight to question whether the boy was guilty or not. One of these facts dealt with the old man who claimed he saw the boy running down the stairs from his apartment.
The more the jury talked about the old man and what he said, 12 angry men analysis essay, the more Juror eight questioned if he had really seen the boy or not. One of the jurors pointed out that the man was dragging his left foot behind him, but trying to cover it up because he was ashamed. During the trial, the old man stated he heard a body hit the floor, and someone starting to run. He then said it took him no more than 15 seconds after he heard the body hit the floor to run out of his apartment and to the stairs to witness the boy running down them. Juror 8 thought then if it really could have taken him 15 seconds if he was dragging his left leg. This is when the jurors played out the scene to figure it out themselves.
They were able to get a 12 angry men analysis essay of the apartment and measure out the dimensions of the room they were in. Juror eight walked the length of the room and back, 12 angry men analysis essay, while Juror two timed him. As he approached the end, Juror 2 said it took 41 seconds to walk the length they had measured out. By playing out the scene of the old man, this proved the fact it could not have taken the man 15 seconds, and he could not have seen the boy running down the stairs, 12 angry men analysis essay. Another important fact happened during the very end of the deliberation.
At this point, everyone but two people believed the boy was innocent. Juror four says his reasoning for believing the boy is guilty is because of the woman across the street who claims she saw the murder herself. As he is talking, he takes his glasses off and begins rubbing the outside part of his nose where his glasses lay. Juror nine notices this, and asks him why he rubs his nose like that. Juror four says it is from his glasses, that they bother his nose, so he rubs him. Juror nine notices the markings on his nose from his glasses, and recalls the woman had the exact same markings on her face. He then asks Juror four if there is any other possible way to get those same markings on his nose, and he replies no. These two examples show how hidden facts slowly come out.
Character Analysis for 12 Angry Men (1957)
, time: 11:30≡Essays on 12 Angry Men. Free Examples of Research Paper Topics, Titles GradesFixer
Apr 13, · 12 Angry Men Movie Analysis Free Essay Example. April 13, by Essay Writer. Introduction: This movie analysis will focus on the movie 12 Angry Men. There will be comparisons between the movie and the different negotiation tactics used in the movie and even in class. There were lessons learned from this movie and it gave new ways of thinking May 25, · Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men Essay Example. In 12 Angry Men, an eighteen-year-old boy is on trial for the murder of his father. Many thought this case was going to end quickly as the boy and his father lived in the slums and the boy had a record of violence from his earlier years which went further against his case Analysis of a Small Group Communication in 12 Angry Men. INTRODUCTION In the “Twelve Angry Men” film, the actions and behaviors of the Jurors reveal the concept of a small group communication. According to Rozell and Gundersen (), group communication is comprised of both task and social components (p. )
No comments:
Post a Comment